From this feedback I understood that my editing had to be improved to a much higher standard. As the majority of the audience noted that the editing was 'somewhat' adequate/up to scratch meaning their was room for improvement.
From this feedback I learned what about my film's editing needed to be changed or what else needed to be added. This included making my title stay on screen longer, the audio needed to be looked through and changed due to an issue. The volume also dipped at the end which needed to be modified to be the same volume as the rest. I needed to add more variations as well as more transitions between clips opposed to a simple cut which was the case for some parts of my documentary. I also added more cutaways and b-roll footage as it fits the codes and conventions of my genre as a racing and a historical documentary to have historical footage of racing, crowds etc.
From this feedback I understood that my dialogue and photos were mostly engaging to the audience but there was some (if small) room for improvement.
My film didn't have any subtitles which means that people who are hard of hearing or deaf would be unable to enjoy my documentary. I also added a transition after the title screen to help the documentary flow better and appear more well edited. I added more archival footage and B-ROLL film to create more variety of shots.
From this feedback I saw that the music does fit the codes and conventions of my film and its genres and therefore doesn't need to be changed.
From this feedback I concluded that the music I used inside my documentary is fine as it is as the pace, tempo and genre all fit/mirror the pace and genre of my film. However, the music was too loud in places and muddled the dialogue. In order to solve this issue, I decreased the volume throughout, by around 4-5 decibels.
No comments:
Post a Comment